The Cincinnati Kid – 1 star
The lure of Steve McQueen is a steely resolve that doesn’t need a lot of explanation. McQueen is the Cooler King, driven by an unarticulated obsession with escape. Or Frank Bullitt, even-tempered yet resolute as he doggedly figures out a conspiracy while courting Jackie Bissett (who, of course, wants to know what’s ticking . . . . up there). The Sand Pebbles, Papillon, The Getaway, The Magnificent Seven, Nevada Smith . . . all pretty much the same guy, with some slight moderation on the irony-to-darkness meter. Always something hidden, a mix of detached bemusement, determination and code.
In The Cincinnati Kid, that’s who we are promised, but the film is so bare bones and uninvolving, it only succeeds in exhibiting how skeletal McQueen can actually be.
He’s a hot shit stud poker player who gets his chance at the top man (Edward G. Robinson) and there is a little skullduggery afoot before and during their epic showdown on the felt. Some of it is business (Rip Torn and Karl Malden vie for his loyalty), some of the heart (child-like Tuesday Weld offers love, voluptuous Ann Margret her vixen’s hips), and none of it is interesting. The Weld-McQueen union is hollow, the Margret-McQueen coupling inexplicable (she oozes, McQueen snoozes), and the shenanigans between Torn and Malden are pedestrian.
Only Robinson, as an aging card player tiring of every young buck who wants to take him on, offers some shading and intellect.
This is a sleepy rip-off of The Hustler.
I agree the movie isn’t good or even interesting in a bad way, but I enjoyed watching McQueen and Robinson. Even in a bad movie, those two actors drew me in. I also thought Joan Blondell (the female dealer “Lady Fingers” who alternated with Malden’s character) was surprisingly good.
The story and romance are so bad, though, that a handful of fine acting performances couldn’t save it.
Torpid, which happens. But it was weird to see McQueen so listless.